Jerry and Kim were charged with grand theft for stealing a famous painting from a museum. The prosecution claims that Jerry planned the heist but the theft was carried out by Kim and Lewis. Lewis was given immunity in exchange for testifying against Jerry. Kim entered a guilty plea. Will Kim be allowed to testify that, the day after she agreed to help steal the painting, Jerry told her how to disable the security cameras at the museum?
A) Yes, it is a statement by a co-conspirator.
B) Yes, it is a spontaneous statement.
C) No, it is a declaration against interest.
D) No, unless someone from the security company testifies.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q42: Prior inconsistent statements are admissible to impeach
Q44: The Dying Declaration Exception to the Hearsay
Q45: Jerry and Kim were charged with grand
Q47: Jerry and Kim were charged with grand
Q48: Oscar is on trial for beating Lola,
Q49: Mary worked at a bank. Ned approached
Q51: Explain why the Hearsay Rule was developed
Q53: Mary worked at a bank. Ned approached
Q55: Explain how the Admissions Exception to the
Q55: Oscar is on trial for beating Lola,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents