In 2011, the U. S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that part of ____________ public campaign finance law was unconstitutional because it forced privately funded candidates to restrain their spending or risk triggering additional public funds for their opponent.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Arizona's public campaign finance law was unconstitutional because it provided additional public funds to candidates who faced high-spending opponents, thus potentially limiting the spending of privately funded candidates.