How would conflict theorists explain the difference in sentencing between crack and cocaine?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Conflict theorists argue that laws and their enforcement reflect the interests of the powerful. Since the upper classes are more likely to use cocaine and have influence over lawmaking, they can ensure that penalties for cocaine are less severe than for crack, which is more commonly used by lower socioeconomic groups.

How Would Conflict Theorists Explain the Difference in Sentencing Between