How would conflict theorists explain differences in sentencing between crack and cocaine possession?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Conflict theorists argue that disparities in sentencing for crack versus cocaine possession reflect the influence of social and economic power. They suggest that because cocaine is more commonly used by people in higher socioeconomic classes—who also have greater influence over lawmaking—laws and sentencing have been structured in ways that are less harsh for cocaine possession compared to crack, which is more often associated with lower socioeconomic groups.

How Would Conflict Theorists Explain Differences in Sentencing Between Crack