The Condorcet paradox shows that
A)allocations of resources based on majority rule are always inefficient.
B)problems in counting votes can negate legitimate democratic outcomes.
C)the order on which things are voted can affect the result.
D)transitive preferences are inconsistent with rationality.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Condorcet paradox demonstrates that the order on which things are voted can affect the result of an election. This paradox arises when there are three or more alternatives or candidates, and the preferences of the voters are not all the same. In this situation, it is possible that no candidate will receive a majority of first place votes. Instead, the winner will depend on the order in which the candidates are voted. This paradox highlights the potential for the voting system to be manipulated by changing the order of the voting alternatives.

The Condorcet Paradox Shows That