The ruling that competence to stand trial is a "sufficient present ability to consult with [one's] attorney with a reasonable degree of rational understanding, and…a rational, as well as factual understanding of the proceedings" stems out of which Supreme Court case?
A) Ford v. Wainwright (1986)
B) Dusky v. United States (1960)
C) Johnson v. Zerbst (1938)
D) Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: A judge will order a competency evaluation
Q5: One of the problems with the Dusky
Q6: Which of the following would be considered
Q7: When defendants enter a plea of guilty,
Q8: The question of a defendant's competence can
Q10: A defendant who pleads guilty waives a
Q11: Forensic psychologists generally make between _ and
Q12: Which of the following would be considered
Q13: In 2011, Jared Loughner shot Congresswoman Giffords
Q14: The different abilities implicated in the competency
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents