In the historic case of Hamer v. Sidway , the nephew:
A)lost, as there was no consideration.
B)lost, as the uncle was dead.
C)won, as there was consideration.
D)won, as there was a completed gift.

Question

In the historic case of Hamer v. Sidway , the nephew:​
A)lost, as there was no consideration.
B)lost, as the uncle was dead.
C)won, as there was consideration.
D)won, as there was a completed gift.

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Hamer v. Sidway, the court ruled in favor of the nephew, determining that the uncle's promise to pay him if he refrained from drinking, using tobacco, swearing, and playing cards or billiards for money until he was 21 constituted a valid consideration. The nephew's abstention from these activities was deemed a sufficient sacrifice or detriment to constitute consideration, making the uncle's promise enforceable.

In the Historic Case of Hamer V