Alice is a possible juror in a trial of Carla for the crime of robbery. Alice is questioned as to her knowledge of the defendant and about her general notions of the guilt or innocence of persons accused of crimes. Which of the following motions by Carla's attorney is the best example of one that is both legally correct and tactically appropriate?
A) After Alice states she believes that police never make mistakes, Carla's attorney makes a peremptory challenge to excuse Alice from the jury.
B) After Alice states she believes that police never make mistakes, Carla's attorney makes a challenge for cause to excuse Alice from the jury.
C) After Alice states she is very excited to be selected to serve on a jury, Carla's attorney makes a challenge for cause to excuse Alice from the jury.
D) After Alice states she believes a person is innocent until proven guilty, Carla's attorney makes a peremptory challenge to excuse Alice from the jury.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q43: Acting in pro se is
A)refusing to pay
Q44: Which of the following is not a
Q45: Which of the following is an equitable
Q46: A person in the business of formally
Q47: Which of the following is characteristic of
Q49: A discovery tool that is useful to
Q50: One of the major attractions of the
Q51: A court order directing a sheriff to
Q52: Carla filed a lawsuit against her neighbor
Q53: The questioning of potential jurors before selection
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents