Sawyer (1966)and Sines (1970)examined studies in which test results were interpreted by a set of rules and compared them to studies in which trained professionals interpreted the test results. They found that
A)the professionals were more accurate than the set of rules.
B)the set of rules was more accurate than the trained professionals.
C)there was no difference between the set of rules and the professionals.
D)the professionals were more accurate, but only when they knew the rules.

Question

Sawyer (1966)and Sines (1970)examined studies in which test results were interpreted by a set of rules and compared them to studies in which trained professionals interpreted the test results. They found that ​
A)the professionals were more accurate than the set of rules.
B)the set of rules was more accurate than the trained professionals.
C)there was no difference between the set of rules and the professionals.
D)the professionals were more accurate, but only when they knew the rules.

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Sawyer (1966) and Sines (1970) found that a set of rules was more accurate than trained professionals in interpreting test results, highlighting the potential effectiveness of systematic approaches over human judgment in certain contexts.

Sawyer (1966)and Sines (1970)examined Studies in Which Test Results Were