In regards to the debate between the whole-word approach vs. providing phonics instruction, research found that
A) systematic phonics instruction produced better readers, with a greater effect for children of low ability or from disadvantaged backgrounds.
B) a whole-word approach produced better readers, especially for children from disadvantaged backgrounds.
C) phonics instruction diminishes student motivation to read.
D) phonics instruction occurs incidentally in the classroom and does not need to be taught systematically.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Research has consistently shown that systematic phonics instruction is more effective in teaching reading skills than the whole-word approach. It is particularly beneficial for children of low ability or those from disadvantaged backgrounds, as it provides a structured way of understanding the relationships between letters and sounds, which is crucial for decoding and reading fluency.

In Regards to the Debate Between the Whole-Word Approach Vs