In Hudson v. Michigan (2006) , Detroit police did not knock before entering the defendant's home with a warrant. Instead, they announced themselves and waited for only three to five seconds before making their entrance. In this case, the Court stated that:
A) the search was inadmissible because the officers were not in hot pursuit.
B) improper knock and announce is not enough to disqualify evidence uncovered on the basis of a valid search warrant.
C) improper knock and announce is unreasonable enough to provide defendants with immunity under the Fourth Amendment.
D) because of exigent circumstances, the police officers did not need to announce themselves.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q47: Which of the following statements is true
Q48: In which of the following cases can
Q49: Which of the following is the recommended
Q50: Which of the following has been offered
Q51: Who among the following has the authority
Q53: According to law professor H. Richard Uviller,
Q54: Which of the following was ruled by
Q55: Brent, a police officer, has taken a
Q56: Which of the following statements best describes
Q57: Generally, Miranda requirements apply only when:
A) a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents