Solved

In Ring V Arizona , 536 U

Question 1

Multiple Choice

In Ring v. Arizona , 536 U.S. 584 (2002) , the Court held that a state capital sentencing procedure that permitted the sentencing judge to make the factual determination of aggravating and mitigating circumstances violated the: ​


A) Sixth Amendment's right of trial by jury.
B) Sixth Amendment's right of trial by judge.
C) Sixth Amendment's right to a speedy trial.
D) Eighth Amendment's right to freedom from cruel and unusual punishment.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Related Questions

Unlock this Answer For Free Now!

View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions

qr-code

Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks

upload documents

Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents