In using deterrence as the justification for excluding valid evidence, the Court weighs:
A) the evidence of guilt against the nature of the constitutional violation.
B) the social costs against the deterrent effect.
C) the honesty of the courts.
D) the fact that there is no right without a remedy.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q13: Which doctrine holds that illegally seized evidence
Q14: Initially, the exclusionary rule only applied to
Q15: What was the first case to hold
Q16: How often does evidence seized illegally result
Q17: The exclusionary rule bans illegally obtained evidence
Q19: In what case did SCOTUS hold that
Q20: What is another term used to describe
Q21: The deterrence justification bans not only evidence
Q22: Which of the following is a social
Q23: U.S. v. Leon (1984)created the:
A)good-faith exception.
B)knock-and-announce rule.
C)exclusionary
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents