In Hudson v. Michigan (2006), the court held that failure to comply with the knock-and-announce rule is in violation of the exclusionary rule, even if officers have a valid warrant to search a home.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Hudson v. Michigan (2006), the Supreme Court held that evidence obtained after a violation of the knock-and-announce rule is not subject to the exclusionary rule if the officers have a valid warrant to search a home. This means that evidence can still be used in court even if officers fail to follow the knock-and-announce requirement.

In Hudson V