Police used a thermal imager to scan Kyllo's home, because they had information that he was growing marijuana. Officers did not have a warrant and claimed the search was in plain view. SCOTUS ruled that:
A) the use of a thermal imager did not alter the fact that the officers observed the marijuana in plain view.
B) the use of a thermal imager to explore details of a home that, in the past, would have been unknown without a physical intrusion is a search and is subject to Fourth Amendment requirements.
C) thermal imagers are common devices and, therefore, the search was in plain view.
D) the use of a thermal imager is always illegal.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q31: In U.S. v. Galpin (2009), the court
Q32: The case of State v. Patino (2012)resulted
Q33: Which of the following is one of
Q34: The Fourth Amendment balances the government's power
Q35: The two-pronged test of privacy to determine
Q37: The digital age has presented unique challenges
Q38: In Illinois v. Caballes (2005), SCOTUS held
Q39: The Fourth Amendment only protects against invasions
Q40: According to SCOTUS, which of the following
Q41: SCOTUS created the two-prong evaluation of privacy
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents