Arizona v. Johnson (2009) ruled that:
A) it's lawful to frisk a passenger in a lawfully stopped vehicle, even if the passenger wasn't suspected of committing a crime.
B) it's not lawful to frisk a passenger in a lawfully stopped vehicle, even if the passenger wasn't suspected of committing a crime.
C) highway sobriety checkpoint programs are reasonable stops of citizens, even when there's no individualized suspicion.
D) highway sobriety checkpoint programs are reasonable stops of citizens, only if there's individualized suspicion.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: The balancing approach to reasonableness:
A)requires courts to
Q9: The totality-of-facts-and-circumstances test is also known as
Q10: As per Maryland v. Wilson (1997), police
Q11: The U.S. Constitution requires police officers to
Q12: The first question to ask in a
Q14: According to the SCOTUS opinion in Terry
Q15: Reasonable suspicion needed to make a stop
Q16: Which of the following activities cannot be
Q17: Rules to tell officers, courts, and the
Q18: In Florida v. J.L. (2000), what did
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents