In Illinois v. Lidster (2004), SCOTUS held that:

Name: In Illinois v. Lidster (2004), SCOTUS held that:
Brand: Quizplus
Rating: 4.8 (57 reviews)

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Illinois v. Lidster (2004), the Supreme Court held that a checkpoint set up to gather information about a hit-and-run incident was constitutional. This decision was based on the reasoning that the primary purpose of the checkpoint was to solicit information from the public to solve a specific crime, rather than to detect evidence of ordinary criminal wrongdoing.

In Illinois V. Lidster (2004), SCOTUS Held That