In City of Indianapolis V

In City of Indianapolis v. Edmond (2000) , the Court held that drug interdiction checkpoints: ​

A) did not violate the Fourth Amendment, because they were a minor inconvenience.
B) did violate the Fourth Amendment, because they were a major inconvenience.
C) did not violate the Fourth Amendment, because they were indistinguishable from general crime control interests.
D) did violate the Fourth Amendment, because they were indistinguishable from general crime control interests.