Routine detentions at international borders don't require reasonable suspicion to back up lengthy detentions or frisks.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q18: In Florida v. J.L. (2000), what did
Q19: According to the SCOTUS opinion in Terry
Q20: Which of the following circumstances has been
Q21: Categorical suspicion:
A)can be sufficient in itself
Q22: In City of Indianapolis v. Edmond (2000),
Q24: Frisks are:
A)the most invasive type of search.
Q25: Fourth Amendment stops are not warrantless seizures.
Q26: In Maryland v. Wilson (1997), the case
Q27: The case of Michigan v. Sitz (1990)challenged
Q28: The reasonableness of roadblocks and checkpoints is
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents