According to the SCOTUS opinion in Illinois v. Wardlow (2000), a person's mere presence in a high crime area can supply the objective basis needed for a stop.

Question

According to the SCOTUS opinion in Illinois v. Wardlow (2000), a person's mere presence in a high crime area can supply the objective basis needed for a stop. ​

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Illinois v. Wardlow (2000), the Supreme Court held that while presence in a high crime area is a relevant contextual consideration, it alone does not give police the reasonable suspicion required for a stop. The decision emphasized that it was the defendant's unprovoked flight upon noticing the police, combined with his presence in a high crime area, that provided officers with sufficient reasonable suspicion to justify stopping him.

According to the SCOTUS Opinion in Illinois V