In Cawley V

In Cawley v. Eastman Outdoors, Inc . , the court

A) found that Cawley was negligent in using the arrows for 2 years prior to the incident and entered summary judgment for Eastman Outdoors on all claims.
B) found that Cawley was improperly using the arrows and thus could collect nothing against Eastman Outdoors.
C) took judicial notice of the defective carbon used in manufacturing the arrows and entered summary judgment for Cawley.
D) granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment on the design defect, inadequate warning, and failure to conform to representations claims and denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment on the manufacturing defect claim.