Which of the following would not ordinarily constitute consideration (as in Rose v. Elias ) ?
A) A promise to pay money
B) Money payment to buy an option
C) Love and affection
D) Services constituting companionship
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q14: In Hanks v. McNeil Coal Corporation (the
Q15: _ is an equitable principle asserting that
Q16: Which of the following is most likely
Q17: A quasi-contract may be imposed by the
Q18: Which of the following must be made
Q19: Reformation of a written contract is appropriate
Q20: In Lucy v. Zehmer (the "seller" claimed
Q21: In the case of Hoffman v. Red
Q23: A contract formed between parties of very
Q24: In Tierney v. Four H Land Company
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents