In Star Valley Ranch Association v. Daley, the court held that
A) property owners are bound by restrictive covenants if they took the property with notice of those covenants; therefore, the covenants can only be amended by consent of 100% of the property owners.
B) the district court did err in holding that the amended covenants were invalid as they pertained to Plats 1, 2, and 3 of the Star Valley Ranch Subdivision because 73% of all of the lot owners of record voted to amend the covenants.
C) the district court did not err in holding that the amended covenants were invalid as they pertained to Plats 1, 2, and 3 of the Star Valley Ranch Subdivision because only 60% of the lot owners in Plats 1 and 2 voted to amend their covenants, and only 63% of the lot owners in Plat 3 voted to amend their covenants.
D) the developer can amend the restrictive covenants without consent of the property owners simply to make the covenants throughout the development identical.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q11: The Supreme Court in the case of
Q12: Most nonfreehold estates are
A) fee simple.
B) life
Q13: _ is a means of acquiring title
Q14: A conveys Blackacre to B for as
Q15: The process whereby real property is sold
Q17: A right of way over another's property
Q18: Fee simple estates
A) can never be alienated.
B)
Q19: Which of the following is a future
Q20: Leaving your car with your mechanic creates
Q21: In Martin v. Bicknell , the court
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents