In Tummino v. Hamburg, the court held that
A) the Secretary of Health and Human Services, rather than the Food and Drug Administration, did have authority to make the decision concerning emergency contraceptives.
B) the action of the Secretary of Health and Human Services was not reviewable under the Administrative Procedure Act.
C) the decisions of the Secretary of Health and Human Services with respect to emergency contraceptives were arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable .
D) the decisions of the Secretary of Health and Human Services with respect to emergency contraceptives, although political, were not arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable .
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q14: Notice-and-comment rulemaking is considered preferable to the
Q15: _ expresses the legislative function of agencies.
A)
Q16: The Bi-Metallic and Londoner cases formulated a
Q17: Judges are immune from tort suit
A) at
Q18: Goldberg v. Kelly established a right to
Q19: A suit against a city based on
Q20: The courts have shown the greatest reluctance
Q22: A town that abolishes its police department
A)
Q23: When a government official is given discretion
Q24: In Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents