In People v. Alexander , a law clerk was found not guilty of contempt for preparing an order for the court because
A) opposing counsel participated in the process.
B) he was a licensed paralegal.
C) he was ordered to do so by the judge.
D) his conduct did not constitute the unauthorized practice of law.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: The ethical rationale for requiring that only
Q11: In People v. Mitchell (Mitchell woke up
Q12: Client confidentiality privilege is lost where
A) an
Q13: The most recent ethical principles formulated by
Q14: Who may be charged with unauthorized practice
Q16: Contingency fees are ethical in which of
Q17: A lawyer must breach confidentiality in which
Q18: The prohibition against attorney advertising was first
Q19: The failure of a professional person to
Q20: A paralegal who discloses a client's privileged
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents