In in Re Wells, the Court Held That

In In re Wells, the court held that

A) Wells would be subject to Public Reprimand for including false and misleading statements in advertising his law firm.
B) the statements on Well's website were substantiated by the facts.
C) Wells would not be subject to discipline because the advertising materials were corrected almost immediately after he received the ethics complaint.
D) Wells's advertising was not unethical because he was only exaggerating his claims about his law firm so as to attract clients.