In United States V

In United States v. Zhang , the court held that

A) the language of the National Stolen Property Act was broad enough to include intangible property.
B) the history of the National Stolen Property Act showed that Congress meant it to cover tangible and intangible property.
C) the language of the National Stolen Property Act had been amended to cover digital property.
D) the indictment must be dismissed because it did not allege that Zhang stole goods, wares, or merchandise within the meaning of the National Stolen Property Act.