In Dryer V

In Dryer v. National Football League , the court held that

A) NFL Films' use of video footage of the players playing football violated their publicity rights, caused consumer confusion, and unjustly enriched the NFL.
B) the NFL did not have a valid and enforceable copyright in the game footage gathered by NFL Films during each NFL football game.
C) copyright was not the proper subject matter of a federal preemption claim.
D) the National Football League's valid copyright in the game footage preempts the three professional football players' publicity claims.