In People V. Perez, the Court Held That

In People v. Perez, the court held that

A) Perez was guilty of direct, rather than indirect, criminal contempt.
B) the judge should be disciplined for taking out what she saw as disrespect on an innocent bystander.
C) the evidence was sufficient to support the court's finding of indirect criminal contempt.
D) viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the state after considering the multiple ways a respondent may commit indirect criminal contempt, the state's evidence did not establish that Perez was guilty of indirect criminal contempt beyond a reasonable doubt.