Kelly was an employee of a retail outlet. Although the nature of the work and duties performed by both male and female workers were comparable, the remuneration paid to male workers was significantly higher compared to the female employees. When Kelly brought this to the attention of the management and objected to the difference in pay, her services were terminated without good cause. Under which law can she challenge her termination?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Model Employment Termination Act (META) prohibits employers from terminating employees without good cause. In this case, Kelly was terminated without good cause after she objected to the difference in pay between male and female employees. Therefore, she can challenge her termination under META.

Kelly Was an Employee of a Retail Outlet