In Smith v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc., an accommodation that would eliminate an essential function of the employee's job is not reasonable, and an employer is not required to wait indefinitely for:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

An accommodation that would eliminate an essential function of the job is not considered reasonable, and employers are not required to wait indefinitely for an employee to return to work. This principle is based on the understanding that certain job functions are fundamental, and accommodations cannot impose undue hardship on the employer, including significant delays in an employee's return to work.

In Smith V