In Soldano v. O'Daniels , the court re-examined the common-law rule of nonliability for not taking affirmative action to save someone from peril. The court considered which of the following factors with respect to imposing duties for affirmative action by third parties?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court in Soldano v. O'Daniels focused on the moral blame attached to the defendant's conduct and the policy of preventing future harm when considering imposing duties for affirmative action by third parties. This approach emphasizes the ethical responsibility of individuals to prevent harm when possible, rather than attributing blame to the victim or considering financial implications.

In Soldano V