The Katz v.United States (1967) case,while shifting the Fourth Amendment inquiry from property rights to privacy rights,did not result in a lot of reversals of previously decided cases.Why were there not a lot of reversals following the decision?
A) privacy protection requires a reference to "place"
B) a change in focus applies only to future cases and no reversals can occur
C) no cases have come before the court requiring a reversal
D) a reversal would require a constitutional amendment
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: The method of establishing probable cause through
Q4: Some courts require additional information to establish
Q5: The cases of Aguilar v.Texas (1964)and Spinelli
Q6: Which of the following, standing alone, can
Q7: The Katz v.United States (1967)case is known
Q8: Which of the following is the most
Q9: A patrol officer stops a car and
Q10: The change from viewing the Fourth Amendment
Q12: Following the decision in Illinois v. Gates
Q18: Based on the Aguilar-Spinelli criteria, in order
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents