In the case of Franks v.Delaware,the Court determined that if a search warrant was issued based on some exaggeration by the applying officer of the factual basis for the warrant,the seized items must be suppressed as evidence.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In the case of Franks v. Delaware, the Court determined that if a search warrant was issued based on a knowing and intentional false statement made by the applying officer, the seized items must be suppressed as evidence. However, if the exaggeration was not knowing and intentional, the evidence would not be suppressed.

In the Case of Franks V