In Chimel V.California,the Court Ruled That an Officer

In Chimel v.California,the Court ruled that an officer

A) may search the person arrested and the area into which he could reach for a weapon without additional justification.
B) needs additional articulable suspicion that the arrestee is armed in order to search the arrestee for weapons.
C) needs additional reasonable suspicion to search the area into which an arrestee could reach for a weapon.
D) may without additional justification search the person arrested, but a search of any other area requires additional justification.