The Gant v.Arizona (2009) case limited police ability to search a vehicle incident to arrest to situations:
A) involving an arrest for a violent crime.
B) where the arrestee/occupant is unsecured and within reaching distance of the passenger compartment or there is reason to believe the vehicle is not owned by the arrestee/occupant.
C) where there could be evidence of the crime in the vehicle or there is reason to believe the vehicle may be moved if not searched immediately.
D) where the arrestee/occupant is unsecured and within reaching distance of the passenger compartment or there could be evidence in the vehicle of the crime for which the person was arrested.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: In the majority of states, arrest warrants
Q23: Officers may not deliberately move an arrested
Q25: During a search incident to arrest, officers
Q26: The police may, in some situations, delay
Q27: ?Based on Chimel v.California,the key question in
Q28: For an item to be validly seized
Q29: A police officer has arrested a man
Q32: For minor crimes unlikely to involve the
Q32: The U.S.Supreme Court case Gant v.Arizona (2009)overruled
Q36: In general, if a police officer makes
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents