What did the U.S. Supreme Court rule in the case of Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2004) ) ?
A) The court argued that Secretary of State Rumsfeld overstepped his powers by allowing the torture of this Syrian citizen.
B) The court rejected Hamdan's arguments that, as a U.S. citizen, he had legal rights that protected him from detention without trial.
C) The court agreed that Hamdan could sue the U.S. government for medical damages he obtained on the battlefield in Afghanistan.
D) The court supported Hamdan's view that, as a U.S. citizen, he had legal rights that needed to be protected.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q18: What are two reasons that scholars of
Q19: What set the U.S. president's authority to
Q20: The phrase, "you, as commander-in-chief, can do
Q21: Much is written about the struggle over
Q22: Executive branch institutions tend to be roughly
Q24: Who was the person who leaked a
Q25: What did the Supreme Court decide regarding
Q26: What are the two primary reasons that
Q27: What is often the outcome when several
Q28: What do researchers who focus on the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents