Susan Smith owns a floral shop in Mesa, Arizona. Ms. Smith has designed a special vase that allows fresh flowers to stay fresh longer. She has a patent pending on the vase. Ms. Smith learns through a friend that a man who visited her floral shop while on vacation from Minnesota has begun producing and selling the vase to flower shops around the country. The man has only been in Arizona once and it was for personal vacation. Ms. Smith has been unable to stop him from the production of the vases. If she wishes to bring suit against him, which of the following statements is true?
A) She will have to bring suit in Minnesota
B) She will have to bring suit in a Minnesota state court
C) She will have to bring suit in Arizona because that is her residence
D) She cannot bring suit in federal district court because the patent is pending
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q49: The principle of stare decisis forbids a
Q117: An appellate brief:
A)is very short.
B)contains only the
Q119: In a case called Smith v. Zeigfield
Q122: How many U.S. Supreme Court justices generally
Q123: Susan Smith owns a floral shop in
Q125: How does a "long arm" statute affect
Q126: John Dawson has been sued by Ralph
Q130: Gretta Grietham,a Michigan resident,purchased investment bonds from
Q131: Mrs.Phillips purchased a glass baking dish manufactured
Q137: Diagram a typical state court system.
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents