James Keller was an employee at Radical Boards, Inc. Radical Boards is a surf and skateboard shop that also sells clothing. While employed there, Radical Board's principal shareholder discovered that Keller had created peep holes in the shop's dressing rooms. When confronted with the peep holes, Keller denied ever using them and indicated that they were there to prevent shoplifting. The shop manager was told to fire Keller. Shortly after Keller left, a 16-year-old and her mother filed suit because the teen learned, through conversations with Keller, that he had seen her in the dressing room while she was trying on swimming suits. Keller was able to describe her not-generally-seen birthmarks to her. Radical Boards:
A) cannot be held liable to the teen and her mother because it did engage in the conduct.
B) could be held liable under a theory of negligent failure to supervise.
C) is no longer liable because it terminated Keller.
D) has not committed any tort because watching customers in dressing rooms in part of a merchant's right.
E) None of the above
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q88: James Keller was an employee at Radical
Q89: Which of the following defenses to negligence
Q91: The distinguishing element between intentional torts and
Q93: Punitive damages are:
A)generally not available in tort
Q94: Hamburger Hamlets, Inc. is a chain of
Q95: A local liquor store posts the checks
Q96: Which of the following is not an
Q97: Which of the following does not enjoy
Q103: Proximate cause:
A)is the same as causation.
B)need not
Q106: Which of the following constitutes a defamatory
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents