In Robinson v.Durham , the court found:
A) there was a breach of warranty of title between the Robinsons and Durham.
B) the Robinsons were good faith purchasers for value when they bought the car for their business, and they had good title which they passed to Durham.
C) the Robinsons obtained no title from the thief, but they passed good title to Durham since he was a good faith purchaser for value.
D) the Robinsons had a voidable title, and they passed good title to Durham, who was a good faith purchaser for value.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: The buyer and seller of goods may
Q22: Title to goods passes according to rules
Q24: Conrad bought a satellite radio from SX
Q27: Under the CISG:
A) if the sales contract
Q29: The Heinrich v.Titus-Will Sales, Inc.case stands for
Q29: When goods have been damaged without the
Q32: Amanda ordered fifty personalized sweatshirts from King
Q32: A void title may allow good title
Q39: A voidable title is no title.
Q40: A "buyer in the ordinary course of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents