In the Bigelow-Sanford, Inc.v.Gunny Corp.case, the court found:
A) the Code permits a buyer to cover by buying substitute goods if the buyer acts in good faith and without unreasonable delay.
B) the buyer did not purchase substitute goods in good faith and without unreasonable delay.
C) the buyer was required to obtain cover and its failure to do so bars other Code remedies.
D) since the buyer did not specifically allocate the spot market replacements to the individual sellers' accounts, the cost of cover could not be determined in this case.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q3: A contractual remedy is optional unless the
Q6: A buyer who does not cover is
Q10: Specific performance is an equitable remedy which
Q12: The fair market value of a 10-foot
Q13: Which of the following is not a
Q15: Massey Fabrications sells some equipment to Keiser
Q18: Which of the following is correct with
Q21: After a breach by the seller, buyer
Q68: a. Under the Code, when can an
Q73: Under the CISG, what are the damages
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents