The Court in the Schoenberger V

The court in the Schoenberger v.Chicago Transit Authority case held that:

A) the actual authority of an agent may be founded on the acts or words of the agent.
B) ZuChristian had neither actual nor apparent authority to make an offer of a specific salary or to make a promise of additional compensation.
C) implied authority is such authority as the principal knowingly permits the agent to assume.
D) actual authority is such authority as a reasonable, prudent person, exercising diligence and discretion, in view of the principal's conduct, would naturally suppose the agent to possess.