Larson & Son manufactured welders that frequently malfunctioned, setting clothing on fire and causing serious burns.Larson & Son sold all of its assets to Swenson Co., which continued to manufacture the Larson welder product line.Eleven months after Swenson's purchase, one of Larson's customers sued Swenson for injuries caused by a welder purchased from Larson, six months prior to the purchase by Swenson.Under the circumstances, Swenson Co.:
A) cannot be held liable, because it did not manufacture the welder in question.
B) cannot be held liable, because it is a corporation.
C) could not be liable if Larson & Son still exists as a corporate entity.
D) might be held liable in some states under strict liability.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q53: If a company owns 90 percent or
Q54: The Revised Act grants dissenters' rights:
A) to
Q55: If Elliot, a shareholder who dissents to
Q56: Liquidation of a corporation:
A) is set up
Q57: In which of the following situations may
Q59: A(n) _ is a general invitation to
Q60: The right of dissent would exist in
Q61: The use of cash-out combinations has raised
Q64: a. When may the attorney general of
Q70: a. Action Corporation purchases all of the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents