Supporters of Humphreys's "Tearoom Trade" cited all of the following reasons for Humphreys's methods except

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Humphreys's "Tearoom Trade" study is controversial primarily due to its methodology, including the use of deceit and invasion of privacy. Supporters of the study might argue that the deceit was harmless, the topic was worthy of study, and that there were no other ways to study this phenomenon. However, the claim that being a voyeur in sexual encounters "caught on" and led to many replications of his study is not a commonly cited reason for supporting Humphreys's methods. This choice does not reflect a justification for the ethical concerns raised by the study but rather comments on the study's influence, which is not directly related to the ethical defense of his methods.

Supporters of Humphreys's "Tearoom Trade" Cited All of the Following