Which of the following statements is true of liability suits that involve a foreign defendant?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

If the manufacturer of a defective product is located in another country, the U.S. importer, wholesaler, or distributor can be held liable for any injuries caused by the product under the doctrine of strict liability. This is because the U.S. courts have jurisdiction over these entities and they are seen as being in a better position to absorb the costs of any damages awarded.

Option B is incorrect because the long-arm statute does not always provide a U.S. court jurisdiction over a foreign defendant. The court must determine whether there is sufficient minimum contacts between the defendant and the forum state before exercising jurisdiction.

Option C is incorrect because the Hague Convention on the Service of Process does not necessarily accept the means of service used in the U.S. Each country has its own rules on how to serve process on foreign defendants.

Option D is incorrect because the U.S. importer, wholesaler, or distributor is only liable for damages caused by a defective product if they played a part in causing the defect or failed to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of using the product. If the foreign defendant has no assets in the U.S., the plaintiff may not be able to recover any damages, but this does not automatically make the importer, wholesaler, or distributor liable.

Which of the Following Statements Is True of Liability Suits