Cal sprayed pesticide on his crops in a very careful manner on a windless day. Nevertheless, some of the pesticide spray fell on his neighbor's side of the fence and contaminated the cracked corn for the chickens. The chickens died and the neighbor sues. What is the likely result?
A) Cal is not liable because he was not negligent in his spraying operation.
B) Cal is not liable because the neighbor assumed the risk of damage to the feed by placing it so close to the fence.
C) Cal is liable because spraying pesticides is an abnormally dangerous activity.
D) Cal is not liable for the damage because of contributory negligence.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q74: A form of strict liability applies to
Q75: While driving his car five miles over
Q76: Defenses to an action in strict liability
Q77: In Soldano v. O'Daniels , the court
Q78: Which of the following is\are considered in
Q80: In determining the duty of care owed
Q81: Under the Third Restatement, possessors of land:
A)
Q82: What is the difference between contributory negligence
Q83: What is the reasonable person standard? How
Q84: Identify the elements a plaintiff must prove
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents