In the Berardi V

In the Berardi v. Meadowbrook Mall Company case, the court found:

A) plaintiffs must produce subjective evidence of their duress to win a case of economic duress.
B) duress is readily accepted by the courts as a reason to avoid a contract.
C) economic duress must leave the plaintiff no reasonable alternative but to acquiesce to the terms of the contract.
D) plaintiffs who prove economic duress may void the transaction, and this is their complete remedy.