Matt tells Ron that the snow boots he is selling are capable of protection at temperatures of 20° below zero. Ron orders a pair for his trip to Greenland. Upon delivery the box states "will protect your feet in temperatures down to 30° below zero." The first night's temperature goes down to 27 below. Ron suffers frostbite on all of his toes. Ron then sues for breach of warranty. What is the result?
A) Breach, because the latter express warranty is valid.
B) No breach because Matt's statement was merely opinion.
C) No breach because Matt said 20° below zero.
D) No breach because Matt is allowed to be wrong.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q38: A warranty of title may be included
Q39: Implied warranties may be excluded by course
Q40: The liability of manufacturers and sellers of
Q41: Which of the following would most likely
Q42: Which of the following is generally NOT
Q44: The warranty of title for the sale
Q45: Which of the following would constitute a
Q46: Mark tells Leslie that his sweeper has
Q47: Strict product liability exists if:
A) the consumer
Q48: Which of the following is NOT included
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents