In which case did the Court hold that the individual's flight at the sight of police was enough to provide reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop?
A) Illinois v. Wardlow
B) Mapp v. Ohio
C) Terry v. Ohio
D) Weeks v. United States
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q14: What level of proof is required for
Q15: All warrants are to be based on
Q16: The exclusionary rule:
A) provides constitutional protections under
Q17: "Where the facts and circumstances within the
Q18: The almost limitless variations of contacts between
Q20: In Smith v. United States (1949), the
Q21: Although the intent of the Constitution is
Q22: The exception to the exclusionary rule that
Q23: The Constitution does not provide an absolute
Q24: Government agents who have probable cause for
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents