In Murray v. United States (1988), the Court held that evidence initially seen during an illegal search, but later recovered under a valid warrant, would be inadmissible because of the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Murray v. United States (1988), the Supreme Court held that evidence initially seen during an illegal entry but later recovered independently under a valid search warrant was admissible, as the warrant was not based on the observations made during the illegal entry.

In Murray V